Among the main tools and models available to purchasing to implement a category management strategy, the matrix de Kraljic is acclaimed by participants in the Acxias online survey on the subject. With 52.6% of citations, this matrix which compares “the complexity of supply” (competition, risks, etc.) and “the impact on the result” (criticality, volume, etc.) is ahead of the model SWOT and that of Porter's Five Forces chosen respectively by 31.5% and 5.3% of respondents. The remaining 10.6% rely on another model or do not use one. Whatever the preference, most of these methods are often applied in Excel because they are still rarely used in digital solutions. Purchases offering assistance with the classification and analysis of expenses, with the exception of SAP Ariba since the availability of its new module Category management.
⚙ Learn more
Among the arsenal of tools and models available to players in the purchasing sector, intended to develop and implement a Category Management strategy, the Kraljic matrix stands out as the preferred option. , according to the results of the recent online survey conducted by Acxias on this topic. This matrix, which simultaneously evaluates “supply complexity” (taking into account factors such as competition, risks, etc.) and “impact on the bottom line” (taking into account criticality, volume , etc.), garners impressive support, with 52.6% of respondents citing it. It is thus positioned at the top, well ahead of competitors such as the SWOT model and that of Porter's Five Forces, which were respectively chosen by 31.5% and 5.3% of participants.